Standing the Test of Time

These pages present informational materials that continue to be relevant and useful over time, even though they date back five years or more.  The contents provide a perspective over time of the issue of wireless technologies, electromagnetic radiation, and their biological effects.

 Jan 13 2015

Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation Biological Effects and Safety Standards: A Review

STILL HOT (1988) – U.S. Air Force Declassified Information

Scott M. Bolen, Rome Laboratory, Air Force Material Command, Griffis Air Force Base, New York


“The study of human exposure to radiofrequency/microwave radiation has been the subject of widespread investigation and analysis. It is known that electromagnetic radiation has a biological effect on human tissue. An attempt has been made by researchers to quantify the effects of radiation on the human body and to set guidelines for safe exposure levels. A review of the pertinent findings is present along with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) recommended safety standard (C95.1-1982) and the United States Air Force permissible exposure limit for RF/MW radiation (AFOSH Standard 161-9, 12 February 1987).

“An overview of research that was conducted in the Soviet union and Eastern Europe is also included in this report. . . .

May 1 2014

Electrosmog in the Environment (Switzerland)

Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL) June 2005

“Electricity supply systems, electrical appliances and a wide range of transmitters for various wireless applications generate non-ionising radiation (commonly referred to as “electrosmog”)  that can be harmful to our health, depending on its intensity. With its Ordinance relating to Protection from Non-Ionising Radiation, the Federal Council introduced a legal instrument to protect the population against the harmful effects of electrosmog.

“This publication describes the main sources of electrosmog, assesses the associated risks, identifies existing gaps in research and suggests ways in which we can reduce our own level of exposure.”

Feb 18 2014

CNN Special Report 1985 Electromagnetic Frequency (STILL HOT)

military weapons technology

26+ years later and here we are, still questioning whether or not this very technology even exists! Just IMAGINE how far more advanced things are today . . .

Sep 6

PUBLIC EXPOSURE: DNA, Democracy and the ‘Wireless Revolution’ (STILL HOT) 2000

Can microwaves alter our brains and DNA?

“Released in 2000, Public Exposure is the first – and still definitive – independently produced investigative report on this key issue, the human health dangers of Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR) from cell phones & cell towers… and what we can do to protect ourselves.

“Broadcast on LinkTV and in constant use by community groups and concerned citizens around the world, with thousands of DVD copies sold, we now make the authorized one-hour version of Public Exposure available on-line for the first time. DVD copies are available for purchase here:

“First Place award, EarthVision Film Festival.
Co-Produced by EON’s Mary Beth Brangan and Libby Kelley of the Council on Wireless Technology Impacts

Directed and edited by EON’s James Heddle.

Sep 1

List of Authorities on Microwave Radiation / Study references

Compiled by Professor Olle Johansson

Professor Olle Johansson’s list of Authorities who have studied and reported on the effects of microwave radiation.

May 12

The Effect of Microwaves on the Central Nervous System “STILL HOT”

1965- Translated from the German for Research and Scientific Laboratory Ford Motor Company W. Bergman

The author wishes to thank the Management of the Research and Scientific Laboratory of Ford Motor Company for undertaking translation and printing of this paper.

Abstract (1965)

The autonomic nervous system is affected by the microwaves of the centimetre wavelength band. These waved affect circulation, respiration, temperature control, water balance, albumin and sugar concentration in the cerebro-spinal fluid, hydrogen ion concentration, EEG, GSR, sleep, conscious awareness, etc. Depending on the applied dosage, these waves stimulate the sympathetic or parasympathetic system. Very small dosages produce analgesic effects; however very large dosages are fatal. An undamped or modulated frequency is more effective than damped waves. The biological effects of these waves results from the resonance absorption in the ganglia. There are indications that only higher harmonics, and not the fundamental frequency, produce biological effects. The shielding of the test subject by metal screens increases these effects; however, magnetic fields remove them. Higher harmonics producing these biological effects have physical properties which are similar to those of the bio-electrical energy generated by the human body. The mechanism of hypothesis is explained by the transmission of this energy.

Mar 8

Electromagnetic Fields from Mobile Phones: Health Effect on Children and Teenagers


This Resolution was approved by members of the Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (RNCNIRP) at its Committee session on 3 March 2011. The Resolution evolved from scientific statements adopted by RNCNIRP in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2008 and 2009, taking into account contemporary views and actual scientific data. The Resolution represents a viewpoint of the professional scientific community and is meant for public dissemination, for the consumers of the mobile telecommunications services, as well as for the legislative and executive authorities who develop and implement health protection, environmental, communication, scientific and safety policies.

Nov 16

Bee World

Ulrich Warnke’s Effects of Electric Charges on Honeybees (STILL HOT 1976)

Charges on the body of an individual bee and on the colony

Environmental Influences

  • Electric Field
  • Atmospheric Ions
  • Humidity and Temperature
  • Light Irradiation

Changes in Behaviour brought about by electric parameters
Mechanics of these effects
Weather sensitivity of bees


Nov 16


(STILL HOT) Final Study: Working document for the STOA Panel March 2001

European Parliament
Directorate General for Research
Division Industry, Research and Energy
Scientific and Technological Options Assessment

This study focuses upon an aspect of how living organisms and humans in particular can be adversely affected by highly coherent electromagnetic fields of technological origin, in a way that is not entertained or addressed by existing Safety Guidelines – namely, through the possibility of non- thermal, frequency-specific influences of an informational nature. Supporting evidence is presented, and attention drawn to a disturbing consistency between some of these influences and the nature of certain adverse health effects found amongst some exposed people. On the basis of a detailed analysis of the present situation, a number of recommendations are made to promote a higher degree of electromagnetic biocompatibility between these fields and the living human organism than currently obtains.

Sep 13

Evidence that Electromagnetic Radiation is Genotoxic (STILL HOT)

Dr. Neil Cherry: The implications for the epidemiology of cancer and cardiac, neurological and reproductive effects (June 2000)

Dr Neil Cherry, for presentations in May 2000 to NZ Parliament and June 2000 in Italy, Austria, Ireland and at the European Parliament in Brussels. Environmental Management and Design Division P.O. Box 84 Lincoln University Canterbury, New Zealand

“Our frame of reference determines what we look at and how we look. And as a consequence, this determines what we find.” Burke J, The Day the Universe Changed, 1985.


  • Introduction
  • Principles of Approach
  • EMR Spectrum Principle
  • The Bioelectrical nature of biology
  • Neurological Electrical Sensitivity
  • Electromagnetic activity in cells
  • Cardiac Electrical Sensitivity
  • Genotoxicity
  • Direct measurements of Chromosome aberrations
  • Chromosome damage from RF/MW exposure
  • Chromosome damage from ELF exposure
  • Chromosome Aberrations Conclusions
  • Direct evidence of neoplasm in microwave exposed cells
  • Direct evidence of DNA strand breakage
  • Motorola Funded Counter Research on DNA breakage
  • Differences between Lai and Singh and Malyapa et al.
  • The Comet Assay and EMR effects
  • ELF Exposure and DNA strand breakage
  • EMR Altered Gene Activity
  • Immune system impairment by EMR
  • EMR Reduces Melatonin in Animals and People
  • Genotoxicity Conclusions
  • Epidemiological dose-response relationships from RF/MW exposures
  • “Classic” RF/MW studies
  • Global Leukaemia dose response for RF/MW exposure
  • Study Reference Exposure Leukaemia Risk 95% Confidence
  • Childhood Cancer in the vicinity of the Sutra Tower, San Francisco
  • Neurological effects
  • Sleep Disturbance near a Shortwave Radio Tower, Schwarzenburg, Switzerland
  • Multiple Sclerosis in Danish Electric Utility Workers
  • Suicide in U.S. Electric Utility Workers
  • Brain Tumour with VDT exposure
  • Natural EMR Sensitivity of the Human brain
  • Cardiac Effects of EMR
  • Miscarriage in microwave exposed Physiotherapists, United States
  • Conclusions
  • Cell Phone Conclusions
  • References

About Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *